February 19, 2008

The Mystery of the Consumer: Finding Needs and New Ways to Meet Them

The field of marketing is constantly being molded by an assortment of different factors including new ideas, technology, trends, laws, and most importantly consumers. Because consumers change, marketers need to continuously find new ways to reach them and meet their needs. Marketers today try to find any way possible of finding out exactly what it is their consumers want. Innovation becomes increasingly important, both as a means to connect with consumers and as a tool to stay ahead of the competition.

In order to explore this topic further, I have chosen to investigate the blogosphere. During my search, I have come across two interesting blog posts concerning consumer needs and finding innovative ways to serve them.

The first post that I have chosen was written by Larry Bailin, author of the book Mommy, Where do Customers Come From? (pictured left). The post (from connectedcustomers.net) is titled "Hungry for Better Service" and it discusses the implementation of an ESP System at TGI Fridays that allows the customers to notify the waiter electronically when they need assistance using the customer service watch (pictured below). Commenting on the importance of innovation and consumer needs, I have posted a reply on the site and copied it below for convenience.


The second post is one that was published on My Creative Team's blog (THINKing) titled "What Consumers Want." The blog is written by marketing professionals and this particular post gives some remarkable insight into how consumer research can influence marketing decisions in positive and negative ways. The author argues that it is not sufficient to ask consumers what they want, and we should instead be asking questions to discover how they think and how they make decisions. I have posted a comment in response to this post and I have copied it below.


Response to "Hungry for Better Service":

Thank you for the intriguing post on the new ESP System! As a student at the University of Southern California Marshall School of Business, I have come to realize that success in any organization goes far beyond simply meeting the needs of your customers. Success means reaching beyond the status-quo, and doing things that haven’t been done before. Given the competition present today in any industry, especially the restaurant industry, businesses need to be exceeding expectations instead of simply meeting needs. With its new ESP System, TGI Fridays did just that.

Not only does this device improve customer service, but it sets this restaurant apart from all of its competition. I think it is especially important for TGI Fridays to differentiate itself because it does not offer anything different from competing chains and its consumer base is not unique. With this innovation, however, consumers can clearly see the company taking extra steps to serve them. And there is no doubt that this effort is noticed, and talked about. Regardless of the food quality, people will be talking about TGI Fridays because they have come up with something new, something that is designed to make a better dining experience. The word of mouth advertising the company will receive from this innovation is well worth whatever investment they made to implement it.

I would also like to comment on another one of your points, which is the fact that customer service is generally not considered part of a company’s marketing strategy. I definitely agree that this is a crucial factor that can no longer be ignored. In fact, I think the only way to maintain a loyal customer base is to focus on constantly improving customer service. A company can only do so much to differentiate their products. When it is clear to the customer that you are going above and beyond to make their experience an enjoyable one, they will be yours forever.


Response to "What Consumers Want":

This post brings up an interesting point. Traditionally, the focus of marketing was to sell the product to the consumer, whether they wanted it or not. Unfortunately, the result of this tactic was often to present misleading information and deceive the consumers in order to get sales. I think this is where a lot of the mistrust in advertising by the general public stems from. Consumers don’t want to think of themselves as consumers. More importantly, they don’t want to feel like they are being tricked into buying something. They want to think that the companies they buy their products from actually care about them and want to help them solve all their problems.

Today, marketers have shifted their focus from trying to sell their products to an unassuming audience to finding out what their consumers wants and needs are and trying to satisfy those needs. This approach seems not only more humanitarian, but also more profitable. The solution is incredibly intuitive, ask the consumers what they want, then give it to them. But, as we all know, it isn’t that simple. As this post clearly argues, consumers don’t know what they want. In addition, there are too many other factors to consider when developing, redesigning, and marketing a product. Not only do consumers not know what they want and what they and others would actually buy, but they don’t know what is feasible given current technology and monetary constraints. They don’t have information on competitor’s strategies, and they don’t know what is best for your company. Moreover, it is crucial for any business to constantly innovate and think of new ways to serve their customers. Simply giving consumers what they ask for in a focus group or survey is certainly not enough to stay ahead of the game.

I think the point raised in this post concerning studying your consumers’ behaviors versus studying their preferences is entirely valid given my argument. The best way for marketers to learn about what their consumers want is by finding out exactly how they go about their days, what needs to they have that aren’t being met, how they make decisions, and what’s most important to them. Only by understanding how our consumers function can we begin to truly meet their needs.

1 comment:

Antonia Marchette said...

I think you did a great job in focusing on a very prevalent and vital issue to marketing--how to cater to consumers and give them the best experience and service possible. I enjoyed that the two blog posts you chose were still related topics, but not redundant--they addressed different issues in the realm of marketing to a consumer. The dichotomy of the first post against the second—one specifically linked to a single company’s ESP service, against a general marketing theory, was a nice mix. In regards to your "Hungry for Better Service" comment, I enjoyed that you addressed a specific business and the steps it is taking to offer patrons a personalized experience. You brought up a very great point, that TGI Fridays "does not offer anything different from competing chains and its consumer base is not unique”—the ESP device would definitely differentiate them from other restaurant chains. Your second comment on the post “What Customer’s Want”, was also very interesting in that you contrasted your previous post that was extremely specific with a post geared towards a more generalized topic. In general, I have to agree with the author of the post a well as with your comments, in that it is not simple enough to ask a customer “what they want”—many other external factors influence a marketing plan. I enjoyed your analysis of the detailed measures a marketer must pursue in order to truly understand the needs of a customer. Marketing is definitely a mutual relationship to build trust with your customer-base. I think you shed new light on how marketers strive to cater to customers—I really had no idea that Krispy Kreme went to such lengths to create a business that became incredibly popular because of its services. Companies can definitely improve and develop their customer-base if they discontinue surveying focus groups but instead follow the Krispy Kreme model and actually analyze consumers and what they really need—asking them definitely will not cut it. However, your comment on this post could have been strengthened if you provided more specific examples to solidify your argument, rather than simply agreeing with the author. Overall, however, I think you did a great job in finding two posts that were extremely interesting and providing engaging commentary.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.